Hebrews 10:26-31
- Sam Storms
- Nov 3, 2006
- Series: Deciphering Difficult Texts
Here
our author describes someone as continuing in willful sin after having
“received the knowledge of the truth.” The latter need mean no more than that
they have heard and understood the gospel and have given mental assent or
agreement to it. Tragically, many people hear the good news and commit
themselves to shape their lives by the ethics of Jesus and in accordance with
the standards and life of a local church while never experiencing regeneration
and placing their personal trust in Christ for salvation. They then turn from
what they have heard and understood and openly and defiantly repudiate it as
false. There are unsaved theologians and biblical commentators whose “knowledge
of the truth” of Christianity, at least in terms of objective data, is more
extensive and insightful than that held by some true believers. In this regard,
see 2 Peter 2:20-21.
But
the troubling phrase in this passage is in v. 29 where this person is said to
have regarded as unclean “the blood of the covenant by which he was
sanctified.” Does this mean a genuine Christian is in view? Those who affirm
eternal security have pointed to one of two possible interpretations:
First, some have suggested that the “he” who is
sanctified is actually Jesus Christ, not the apostate. This is grammatically
possible. It is also theologically possible, as John 17:19 speaks of Jesus
“sanctifying” himself. We must remember that “to sanctify” can mean “to set apart
for a special purpose or use” without the notion of sin being involved. See
also similar language and thought in Heb. 2:10; 5:7,9; and 9:11-12. Noel Weeks
argues that
“the whole point of the author has been
to emphasize that Jesus has fulfilled the requirements of a High Priest. There
is an analogy between the Aaronic ordinances and the sacrifice of Christ. So it
is reasonable to suggest that as Aaron was consecrated by the blood of the
sacrifice (Ex. 29), so Jesus was consecrated as High Priest through the
offering of His own blood” (WTJ, 39
[Fall 1976], 80).
Second, Wayne Grudem and others contend
that “the word sanctified need not
refer to the internal moral purification that comes with salvation, for the
term hagiazo has a broader range than
that, both in Hebrews and in the New Testament generally” (177). Grudem points
to Heb. 9:13 as an example where the word refers to rendering someone
ceremonially clean but not necessarily spiritually (or savingly) clean. See
also 1 Cor. 7:14; Matthew 23:17,19; 1 Timothy 4:5. The context in Hebrews 10
appears to support this view, as our author is concerned with parallels between
the OT Levitical sacrifice and the better new covenant sacrifice of Christ.
Says Grudem:
“the author of Hebrews knows that some
may fall away, even though they assemble
with the congregation of believers and so share in this great privilege of
coming before God [see 10:19-22]. So he says, ‘not neglecting to meet together,
as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another’ (10:25). The reason to
encourage one another is the warning in 10:26, ‘For if we sin deliberately
after receiving the knowledge of the truth.’ In such a context, it is
appropriate to understand ‘profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified’ to mean ‘by which he was given the privilege of
coming before God with the congregation of God’s people.’ In this sense,
the blood of Christ opened up a new way of access to God for the congregation –
it ‘sanctified’ them in a parallel to the Old Testament ceremonial sense – and
this person, by associating with the congregation, was also ‘sanctified’ in
that sense: He or she had the privilege of coming before God in worship” (178).
Someone who has experienced that awesome opportunity and
privilege only then to willfully repudiate the person and work of Christ
through whom it was made possible can expect only judgment. Consistent with
this, our author then proceeds to distinguish between two groups in 10:39.
There are, on the one hand, those who do not have saving faith and thus
eventually fall away (“shrink back”) into destruction. On the other hand, there
are those who have saving faith and thus persevere to the preserving of the
soul. He doesn’t envision a third group: those who have saving faith and later
fall away.